Questionable Sources on Syria

How Kremlin-backed and fringe media spread a false story claiming the U.S.-led Coalition evacuated ISIS from the front lines

Questionable Sources on Syria

Share this story

How Kremlin-backed and fringe media spread a false story claiming the U.S.-led Coalition evacuated ISIS from the front lines

An independent Syria news outlet, Deirezzor 24, reported that the Coalition forces in Syria carried out a landing operation west of Deir Ezzour to airlift two ISIS commanders and their families on August 26. The reporter referred to the two ISIS commanders as “spies” for the U.S.-led Coalition. While the article did not provide any evidence to support its reporting, it was quickly picked up by both Kremlin-funded and fringe media outlets.

Unsubstantiated reporting from Deirezzor 24. (Source: Deirezzor24)

As the article spread, the original headline changed slightly to fit the narrative of the different outlets.

For example:

A comparison of headlines reported by Deirezzor24 and, South Front, and Veterans Today.

As the story spread on fringe media platforms, an anonymous source spoke to RIA Novosti, a Russian state-funded media outlet, and supposedly confirmed that:

Amid successful actions by Syrian government troops in the eastern part of Syria in late August, a number of field [Daesh] commanders backed by US special services, had been promptly evacuated from Deir ez-Zor to safer regions in order to use their experience in other directions.

Sputnik News readily amplified Deirezzor24’s unsubstantiated reporting. (Source: SputnikNews)

In the same article, Sputnik also reported about another operation that supposedly took place two days later, in which U.S. helicopters “transferred 20 Daesh field commanders and militants close to them from an area south-eastern of the city of Deir ez-Zor to northern Syria.”

This was “confirmed” by the same anonymous “military and diplomatic” source as the initial story. Sputnik reached out to the press office of the Combined Joint Task Force of the Operation Inherent Resolve, which called the allegations false.

Sputnik published the article on September 7; however, the reporting on the unconfirmed second evacuation was first published on September 5 by Inside Syria Media Center, a pro-Assad and pro-Russia media outlet, which did not disclose its sources. The article claimed, “on August 28, the international coalition aviation relocated more than 20 ISIS commanders from Albu Leil village to a military airbase in northern Syria.”

Again, Inside Syria Media Center does not provide a source for the statement. The same was reported in a article titled “US Rescues ISIS Field Commanders in Syria. “The Terrorists R US”, in which the only link to a source was the Deirezzor24 article referring to one unsubstantiated incident.

Nevertheless, at least ten fringe media outlets reported on Sputnik’s interview with the anonymous source “confirming” the two evacuations, including The Free Thought Project, The Duran, and Al-MasdarNews.

@DFRLab wrote about the Al-Masdar news outlet before, when its unsourced article on a chemical attack in Syria inspired #SyriaHoax, an attempt to call in to question Bashar al-Assad’s use of chemical weapons (verified by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, an international watchdog) that led to U.S. airstrikes in April. We found that Al-Masdar is owned by Leith Abou Fadel, an Assad loyalist with close ties to the regime. It serves as an unofficial government outlet and repeatedly attacked regime critics and witnesses to regime atrocities, notably the White Helmets.

The spread of the story across Kremlin-funded and fringe media outlets.

In fact, the article published by Al-Masdar included two more sources, this time identified, to corroborate the anonymous “military and diplomatic” source. The author suggested U.S. President Donald Trump should investigate these incidents, which “Russian analyst [argue] is almost 100-percent true.”

(Source: Al-Masdar News)

The analysts Al-Masdar’s reporting referred to include Igor Korotchenko, editor-in-chief of the Natsionalnaya Oborona (National Defense), and Franz Klintsevich, first deputy chairman of the Russian Upper House’s Defense and Security Committee. Both were interviewed by Sputnik in an article titled “Trump Must Comment” based on Sputnik’s earlier and anonymously sourced article “US Allegedly Rescuing Daesh Commanders from Deir ez-Zor”.

In the article, Korotchenko suggests that President Trump is losing his grip as commander-in-chief of the United States armed forces and calls for an investigation:

It is President Trump who must comment on this and declare clearly: either the evacuation of the Daesh field commanders was authorized by him personally and he assumes all political responsibility for this step, or the [US] special services acted without his approval.

Copies of stories alleging that the United States rescued ISIS commanders was shared more than 14 thousand times in total, generating thousands of impressions and clicks without a shred of evidence to support it.

(Source: Buzzsumo)

The spread of this story demonstrates how a network of both Kremlin-funded loosely alingned fringe media outlets can seed a baseless story in fringe media outlets. This goes on to show how little respect for evidence-based reporting certain media outlets have when it comes to spreading an anti-U.S. narrative.

Follow along for more in-depth analysis from our #DigitalSherlocks.